Blog Read

Amendment of SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020

Amendment of SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020

Amendment-The Investor Advisers are regulated by the Securities Exchange Board of India under the SEBI (Investment Adviser Regulations) 2013 (“IA Regulation”). The IA Regulation broadly comprises the various aspects relating to investment advisers such as their qualification, registration, certification, risk profiling, code of conduct, inspection, and

manner of conduction of inspection. The investment advisors(“IA”)[1]largely provide advisory, distribution, and execution services.

However, in recent years, SEBI has received complaints from several investors regarding the malpractices conducted by the investment advisors such as levying excess fees, non-disclosures of complete fees/services, false promises with respect to returns, etc. Therefore, to strengthen the existing regulation and provide better safeguards to

the rights of the investors, SEBI issued three consultation papers for public comments. Subsequently, SEBI constituted a Working Committee and submitted its report on 2020[2], for public comments, wherein segregation of advisory, distribution, and execution in the services of the investors’ advisors was suggested by SEBI, with an aim to reduce the conflict of interest arising due to multiple services.

Based on the comments received on the report submitted by the Working Committee, SEBI vides its gazette notification dated 03 July 2020, notified

the Amendment of SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020.[3] This article provides an overview of the key changes brought in the IA regulations through this amendment by SEBI.

Contents  hide 

1 Client Level Segregation of Advisory and Distribution Services

2 Implementation of Advice or Execution

3 Changes in the qualification requirements

4 Net Worth[7]

5 Fee

6 Conclusion

7 Reference

7.1 Related

Client Level Segregation of Advisory and Distribution Services

Under the Amendment, Regulation 22 has been substituted to provide a client-level segregation in advisory and

distribution services in order to avoid any conflict of interest. The following conditions have been laid down under the new Regulation:

  • An individual IA shall not provide distribution services.
  • The family of an individual[4]  IA shall not provide distribution services to a client advised by the individual IA.
  • No individual IA shall provide advice to a client receiving distribution services from the family of individual IA.
  • A non-individual IA[5]shall have segregation of services on a group level. The same client shall not be offered advisory and distribution services within the group of the non-individual IA.
  • A non-individual IA is required to maintain an arm’s length relationship between its activities as IA and distributor by providing advisory services through a separately identifiable department or division.

Therefore, the Amendment clarifies that a client shall not be provided with both advisory and distribution services

by an individual IA or within the same group of non-individual IA. It provides for a clear segregation between advisory and distribution services. Accordingly, an IA can either provide advisory or distribution services.

Implementation of Advice or Execution

 A new Regulation 22(A) has been inserted under the Amendment. As per Regulation 22(A), an IA shall provide implementation services in securities to the clients, however the same should be provided without any consideration (which includes any commissions or referral fee) whether embedded directly or indirectly or

received in whatever name, as the case may be. The client shall not be under any obligation to avail of implementation services provided by an IA.

Changes in the qualification requirements

Presently, the following qualifications are required from an IA, partners/representative[6] of an IA under Regulation 7:

  • A professional qualification or postgraduate degree in the relevant subjects.
  • Experience of at least five years in activities related to advice in financial products/securities/asset/portfolio management.
  • The said personnel shall always possess certification on financial planning/ funds/ portfolio management/ investment advisory from the prescribed institutions, including the National Institution of Securities Market.
  • The Amendment also introduces two key definitions:
  • Principal Officer (Section 2(1) (s)): shall mean the managing director or

designated director or managing partner or executive chairman of the board

or equivalent management body who is responsible for the overall function of the business and

operations of a non-individual investment adviser.

  • Person associated with investment advice (Section 2 (1) (r)): shall mean any member, partner, officer, director or employee or any sales staff of such investment adviser including any person occupying a similar status or performing a similar function irrespective of the nature of association with the investment adviser who is engaged in providing investment advisory services to the clients of the investment adviser.

Net Worth[7]

The following conditions are imposed with respect to the Net Worth of an IA under the new Amendment.

  • For an individual IA, the minimum net worth (being the value of net tangible assets) has been increase from INR 1 lakh to INR 5 lakhs.
  • a non-individual, being a body corporate, the minimum net worth has been increase from INR 25 lakhs to INR 50 lakhs.
  •  For a non-individual, being a partnership, the minimum net worth has been increase from INR 5 lakhs to INR 50 lakhs.

It is pertinent to note here that, an existing IA shall comply with the aforementioned requirements within 3 years from date of the

commencement of the Amendment Regulations.

Fee

Considering the complaints received by SEBI from the investors with respect to the exorbitant fee charge by IA’s, the Working Committee had proposed a fee of 2.25% of the assets under management or an absolute amount of Rs 75,000 per annum, thereby providing for a fix fee structure to be complie with by the IA. However, the same has not been notified by SEBI under the new amendment, although, as per the new amendment, the fee shall be charged by the IA

as prescribed by SEBI.

Conclusion

The Amendment seeks to address all the issues faced by an investor while availing the advisory/distribution/execution services from an IA. The amendment aims to strengthen the existing regulation and provide better protection to the rights of the investors by imposing strict and specific conditions on the IA. Accordingly, IA’s should ensure the compliances under the Regulation such as the net worth and qualifications of its personnel. Further, vide its press release dated July 03, 2020, SEBI has clarified that the guidelines dealing with various other issues like key terms and conditions of investment advisory services agreement, modes of charging fee, periodicity etc. will be

separately specified through a circular.


Reference

[1] SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 Section 2(m)

[2] SEBIConsultation Paper on Review of Regulatory Framework for Investment Advisers dated January 15, 2020

[3] sebi(Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 dated on July 03, 2020

[4] SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 Section (2) cl. 1 (gc)

[5] sebi(Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 Section (2) cl. 1 (pa)

[6] “Representatives” is define as an employee or an agent of an IA

who renders investment services on behalf of an IA

[7] Has been rename from “Capital adequacy” to “Net Worth”

Comments

Drop your comment