The Rights of the Deceased: Moral Rights Incidental to Copyright Law
- Vanshika Agrawal
- 2024-04-25
Division of digital assets
Introduction
The contemporary environment is defined by digital resources of significant value that form the new understanding of an asset. Cryptocurrencies, IPRs, and online accounts are the digital assets that constitute a significant aspect of current wealth and identity. Nevertheless, this matter involving the sharing of estates on demise or succession is still not clearly defined even in India.
Understanding Digital Assets
The dawn of this digital wealth is characterized by various cryptocurrencies that have emerged. They operate on decentralized blockchain technology which goes against the traditional understandings of ownership and inheritance. Complexity because, they are intangible and cryptographically secured, accessing them without legal frameworks is hard. In addition, cryptocurrencies have high levels of volatility which makes valuing them difficult because their value can vary drastically.
Over time, intellectual properties such as copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets are going digital. Digital IPR is difficult or impossible to measure and/or divide into shares without adequate regulations as this applies to physical assets. Ascertaining the worth of digital intellectual property as well as equitable allocation to heirs is quite a headache. An additional difficulty in dividing such an asset is that it takes a cross-border perspective because it involves international property rights matters.
There is a complicated dilemma concerning how they will split and divide these digital identities tied to millions of online accounts. The accounts encompassing social networks, emails, cloud storage, and financial avenues are laden with confidential information regarding an individual’s life history. Though after dying or in a dividing process it would be difficult as far as strong security standards, terms of services’ agreements and data confidentiality concerns are concerned. It is particularly difficult in estate planning to find a balance between giving people access and protecting the integrity of personal data.
Legal framework
India has yet to take a clear stance regarding the issue of digital assets. In March 2023, RBI recognized voluntary disclosure agreement transactions as one of the regulated activities for PMLA. Therefore, VDA exchanges, custodians and all other service providers are bound to observe the laws as set by the PMLA which include registration and observing KYC and AML procedures. Nonetheless, the RBI has raised issues regarding the price fluctuations associated with VDAs and their susceptibility to facilitating illegal actions. The Central Bank of India (RBI) issued a circular in June 2022 instructing banks and other financial establishments not to undertake services associated with crypto-based activity.
The RBI is yet to decide on NFTs, which stands for virtual digital assets (VDA) that cannot be exchanged with other units. Accordingly, the RBI has revealed that it treats the NFTs as neither a currency nor one of the payment instruments excluded in the PMLA. On the other hand, the RBI has cautioned about the possible abuse of NFTs in money laundering schemes and fraudulent activities.
Currently, the Indian government has formulated a total strategy for the regulation of digital assets. This strategy will handle items including taxation, consumer protection, and cyber security among others.
Digital asset division technologic dynamics and challenges.
The arrival of technological advances has led to a rise in the manufacturing, storage, and maintenance of digital assets. Nevertheless, this level of technical complexity with which they are created comes in handy and poses difficulties when it comes to division, particularly following demise, and inheritance.
Many security measures are present in digital assets such as encrypted forms of cryptocurrency and private online accounts. Encryption, on the other hand, is meant to guarantee validity as well as a barrier to unauthorized access after death but may also create difficulties for valid accessors postmortem. Digital assets locked away due to the inability to bypass encryption or missing access keys may end up in a court battle.
This basic challenge involves the lack of common access protocols and universal authentication processes for digital assets. Heirs often face challenges when proving ownership or seeking to recover encrypted digital wallets and online assets if their predecessors did not clearly outline the process of access under these circumstances. This therefore requires unique verification methods on inheritance rights and security protocols.
It is a blockchain that is the basis of cryptocurrency; it includes the idea of unchangeable and distributed records. This ensures that no one can tamper with the database, but at the same time ensures that it is difficult to rectify an error or transfer an asset. Due to their irreversibility, it gets very complicated to either restore or pass over digital assets after death.
These challenges require cutting-edge technology and contemporary methods of addressing them. Some examples of viable solutions are developing smart contracts, decentralized authentication measures, or a secure inheritance protocol specific to digital assets. Some of these include the emergence of technologies such as multi-signature authentication or blockchain-based inheritance management systems that can enable safe and authorized access to digital assets.
Digital asset division from regulatory perspectives.
The regulatory framework surrounding the division of digital assets across different jurisdictions worldwide. The example given is that some countries have put in place laws regarding the intergenerational transfer of assets like cryptocurrencies, intellectual property rights, as well as succession planning for accounts on social networks. Nevertheless, such regulatory frameworks are usually distinctly dissimilar which results in a changing scenery of fluctuating regulations.
Most of the time, the regulatory systems in different countries are not consistent and coordinated. Yet there are countries which have welcomed cryptocurrencies and set strict laws while there are others that have chosen either conservative or prohibitive attitudes towards Bitcoin and the likes. Likewise, the coverage and enforcement of their intellectual property laws and online account regulations also greatly differ. Various types of regulatory approaches illustrate how complex it is to regulate dividing digital assets at a worldwide level.
A comparison of Indian regulatory frameworks has been carried out with international ones which have revealed major discrepancies coupled with inadequate consistency of the former with Indian sociological context. Considering the complex cultural, economic, and technical conditions peculiar to India; local laws should take into consideration all peculiarities of this country. However, a lack of such laws and a specific regulatory framework for the division of digital assets in India makes such difficulties even worse because it adds more problems from inherent inequalities worldwide.
Because of India’s socio-economic make-up, India needs regulating procedures that have sufficient provisions that cater for their peculiarities. Non-avoidance of explicit statutes concerning inheritance, valuation, and transfers of cryptocurrencies, property, and online accounts create predicaments for the heirs as well as benefactors. These bridges and clarifications cannot be complete without specifying context-sensitive provisions which should be established to ensure smooth electronic property distribution across India.
In developing regulatory frameworks for dividing digital assets in India, cultural diversity, emerging technologies, and economic trends must be considered. Important legislation should balance fostering innovation, protecting interests, and promoting legal clarity. The regulations should provide a strong legal base that ensures inheritors remain confidently engaged with assets without any disputes or conflicts regarding it.
Include precise inventories of all the estate’s digital assets in estate plans. The procedure also entails creating a catalogue of cryptocurrencies, intellectual properties, and a list of online accounts having access points.
It is crucial to explicitly assign authorized persons or beneficiaries for digital assets. Clearly stating intent on splitting or passing cryptocurrencies, designating legal property rights, and appointing trustworthy persons to handle or inherit virtual accounts simplify this procedure. Specific legal documents indicating how digital assets are to be inherited or wills and trusts could be used in this regard.
To ascertain the legality of intentions and preferences towards splitting, it is necessary to register them formally. Written clauses in a will or trust relating to the division of digital assets can help avoid such controversies amongst the beneficiaries. The inheritance of these assets ought to comply with the relevant state legislation, regulations, as well as statutes.
Recommendations and Future Directions
Urgent reforms should be made regarding existing legal and regulatory gaps concerning digital asset partitioning. It is essential to be very careful regarding proposals that can lead to specific laws affecting Indian inheritance, transfer, or valuation of digital assets in India. Policymakers need to develop comprehensive policies on the division of digital assets, guarding the rights of inheritors and bringing legal certainty into this issue.
Therefore, policymakers and regulators ought to take measures to address these legal inconsistencies in digital asset inheritance. These include engaging stakeholders, soliciting experts’ opinions and well as comprehensive consultations to develop meaningful and pragmatic regulation. It is important to set up specific regulations that include cryptocurrency, digital intellectual property, as well as online accounts.
It is important to promote awareness among the public and legal practitioners on the importance of digital asset planning. There are educational programs, workshops, or campaigns which should provide necessary insight into the intricacies associated with digital assets’ inheritance and the need for estate planning to prevent the situation where people do not know what to do when they die.
Conclusion
The issue of the division of digital assets in India is a complicated problem, which demands urgent attention and prompt activities for its solution. There is no specific law on this matter coupled with rapid technological change makes the complexity around digital wealth inheritance, transfer, or division even more.
India must ensure that its legal systems cover various issues relating to emerging areas in the technology sector such as digital currency, intellectual property rights, and account ownership among others. However, a gap in present laws emphasize the urgency of up-to-date and circumstantial regulations on the split of digital assets.
This makes estate planning necessary for people who own digital assets because it helps them plan for various complications that may arise in the process of sharing their digital assets with successors after death Inventory of comprehensive assets, clear documents regarding intent, and designating permissible receivers or beneficiary.
Reforms must be made to the legal and regulatory environment urgently. It is imperative for specific legislature about digital asset division, careful deliberations, and active involvement of the policymakers. The reforms should be in line with the world’s best practices but also address the various Indian cultures, economies, and technology systems.
Finally, the separation of digital assets will need an urgent approach as well as detailed guidelines in law and prior consideration for estate planning in India. It is therefore important for timely and context-based regulations that will ensure the safe transfer of digital wealth for upcoming generations.
Reference:
Drop your comment